Platonic Fullerene Science and World Peace

The nationwide or tribal political will that places fashionable science and expertise to work, seeks to manage financial employment for the plenty and preserve a defence construction to make sure the continuation of political energy. This may be carried out within the title of democracy, plutocracy, dictatorship, faith, monarchies, and many others. All vie to develop emotional thoughts management spin-aesthetics to persuade their topics that they’re higher off than their competitor nations or tribes. It follows that the thought of a one world authorities should represent a menace to such varied thoughts management methods. Nevertheless, it’s attainable to override this concern by utilizing riorous science to develop a sustainable medical code of ethics, designed particularly to information civilisation right into a state of perpetual world peace relatively than perpetual battle. The one factor stopping this to happen is science itself.

As the total potential of nanotechnology emerges, nations with nuclear weapons at their disposal will start to grasp that they may quickly be not protected by them. It’s apparent that futuristic nano-machines will be capable to mass produce undetectable nano-weapons of mass destruction and there are many keen zealots who could be vastly honoured to make use of them towards civilian populations. Some may declare this to be a pure culling of individuals on an overpopulated planet. There will likely be loads of high-ranking army personnel decided to make use of nanotechnology to cease the spiritual zealots. Alternatively, nanotechnology has the potential to create something from little or no, together with the development of meals and water. With out a accountable science these controlling nanotechnology will carry hell on earth. Nevertheless, with a accountable science to information them to it, utopia is feasible. With the intention to get hold of that utopia, the scientific will to create it should first exist.

The fanatic will to result in violent destruction shouldn’t be restricted to spiritual zealots who inflict on the spot entropic destruction upon harmless civilians. This fanatical will is essentially primary to nearly all extremely skilled scientists as properly. The prevailing scientific world-view’s need to maneuver civilians towards entropic destruction is simply as fanatical, nevertheless it operates in a slower and extra organised method. Scientists want to grasp why that is an correct depiction of the mainstream scientific mindset and to dissociate themselves from a inside compulsion to worship damaging chaos.

The Nobel Laureate Lord Bertrand Russell and Albert Einstein used arithmetic to persuade themselves that individuals should worship chaos destruction. Russell’s hottest essay was entitled ‘A Freeman’s Worship’ during which he wrote that scientists have to be ruled by the physics legislation that Einstein known as the premier legislation of the entire sciences, the legislation of common chaos. On the very finish, Russell wrote, all human artistic genius will likely be completely destroyed inside a universe in thermodynamic smash.This fanatical mindset can’t be emotionally negated by folks frequently telling one another to have a contented day. The time interval for entropic human extinction, in nano-terms, is under no circumstances linked to the prolonged one which Russell and Einstein predicted.

Arguing completely the other to the worshipping of Diabolic chaos, was the Platonic custom of scientific philosophy that, in the course of the third Century BC, created the ‘Science for Moral Ends’. One might properly ask, what makes Platonic logic so vital on this matter of human survival? The reply to that query is that Platonic logic outlined ‘evil’ as a damaging property of unformed matter throughout the bodily atom, which may emerge to destroy civilisation.

The identical mathematical logic that predicted this menace of nuclear destruction additionally applies to the misuse of nanotechnology. One might then ask, who are you able to belief to information ennobling moral authorities for the advantage of all? Platonic ‘good’ was outlined as being for the well being of an infinite universe. Subsequently, the reply is you could belief a medical science primarily based upon a sustainable infinite evolutionary ethic. The subsequent query arises, how will you find an infinite evolutionary ethic that features for the well being of the universe when fashionable mainstream physics prohibits it to exist?

The reply to that query is apparent. Nanotechnology has proven that the molecule of emotion found in 1972 by Dr Candace Pert is a part of a fancy dynamical fractal power system extending its logic to a common infinity in contradiction to Russell and Einstein’s world-view. The molecule of emotion repeatedly upgrades the construction of the endocrine fluids sustaining human well being inside an evolving infinite universe. That course of is the premise of the rising science of quantum biology, which entangles with the energies of chaos to evolve human consciousness. Quantum biology tells us that it’s time to cease worshipping the god of chaos that the traditional Greeks known as Diabolos.

Buckminster Fuller used the Platonic moral arithmetic to develop his synergistic mannequin of the universe and the three 1996 Nobel laureates in chemistry named the premise of their new medical science as Fullerene Chemistry. Fuller wrote a guide entitled ‘Utopia or Oblivion’ during which he postulated that we now have a option to be ruled by the legislation of chaos or by the Platonic engineering rules of creation. To the non-scientist this implies residing in a universe ruled by Platonic love.

From Fuller’s balanced power perspective, derived instantly from Platonic arithmetic, the required medical science will be envisaged during which nano-technology will be guided by an moral Platonic Oath, upgrading the traditional Hippocratic one, utilized in drugs in the present day. In the course of the 18th and nineteenth Centuries, a PhD in science meant a doctorate in philosophy and the nice philosophers of that point, who made the nice electromagnetic discoveries, used the arithmetic belonging to the Platonic moral science to develop moral electromagnetic physics. Any main encyclopaedia will clarify that the discoverer of the electromagnetic discipline, Hans Christian Oersted, wrote his doctoral dissertation, primarily based upon the electromagnetic ethics postulated by the thinker of science Emmanuel Kant.

Friedrich Schelling and Alexander Humboldt upgraded the electromagnetic ethic in phrases appropriate with latest discoveries made by nanotechnology. The Platonic custom of philosophy classifies fashionable scientists as ignorant barbaric engineers, solely match to assist engineer continuous Diabolic chaos. Though Kant’s work is held to vastly affect twenty first Century scientific tradition, it’s a good guess that extraordinarily few scientists studying this text would have the faintest clue that anyone ever reasoned about any kind of electromagnetic ethic, or that scientists previously wrote formulae to display how electromagnetic ethics balanced E=Mc2.

They could due to this fact ask themselves, is it true that I can’t even start to motive about such issues, despite the fact that my PhD confirms me to be a thinker? Have I been taught that I can’t problem Einstein’s entropic world-view? Am I conscious that some scientists merely assume that the universe is infinite so as to derive sensible options to complicated engineering issues? Is it attainable that I could be solely be match to speed up entropic chaos in all of my reasoning until I contemplate linking my hard-earned information to the holographic actuality of quantum biology?

These query are relatively critical ones. In emotional common power phrases, there may be little distinction between a suicide bomber accelerating on the spot entropic chaos upon harmless folks and the event of recent science doing the identical factor in sluggish movement. By ignoring the existence of electromagnetic ethics inside nanotechnology, enormous machines are digging are up uncooked supplies for entropic industrial improvement and large fishing trawlers are netting dolphins because the nets rape the oceans. The perpetrators stay oblivious to the potential of nanotechnology to supply each the uncooked supplies and meals provides from nearly nothing.

It seems to be futile to attempt telling this stuff to a society hell bent on accelerating damaging chaos and fearful for job alternatives through an economic system that transformed Kantian ethics for world-peace on earth into an unattainable entropic cancerous financial development idea. May it grow to be attainable for scientists to permit their sensible however unbalanced coaching to grow to be entangled with the newly rising quantum biology? Individuals must grow to be conscious of what they’re doing after they really feel obliged to stay in full servitude to any of the dictates of twentieth Century entropic arithmetic, physics, politics, economics and spiritual certitude. Then they could be looking out for moral alternatives so as to grow to be a accountable a part of the longer term nano-quantum biology supra-science.

Georg Cantor’s arithmetic is now a elementary a part of fashionable science. It’s time to cease including to him being probably the most vilified mathematician in historical past due to his goal to make use of his infinity arithmetic to result in world peace. The reader is urged to obtain ‘Physics of life: The daybreak of quantum biology’ on Google to examine NASA findings related to this text, as revealed within the journal Nature and containing two subheadings ‘Nature is aware of just a few methods that scientists do not’ and ‘This may simply give us just a few clues within the quest to develop quantum biology’.

© Professor Robert Pope, Advisor to the President Oceania and Australasia of the Institute for Theoretical Physics and Superior Arithmetic (IFM) Einstein-Galilei for Theoretical Physics and Superior Arithmetic (IFM) Einstein-Galilei

java burn
java burn
red boost


Leave a Reply